Comments on: NASA FY2011 and SpaceUp with Chris Radcliff – 3.05 http://www.spacevidcast.com/2010/02/06/nasa-fy2011-and-spaceup-with-chris-radcliff-3-05/ Making Space Commonplace Tue, 07 Feb 2012 06:02:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Buttmunch5000 http://www.spacevidcast.com/2010/02/06/nasa-fy2011-and-spaceup-with-chris-radcliff-3-05/#comment-2090 Buttmunch5000 Sun, 07 Feb 2010 17:19:04 +0000 http://www.spacevidcast.com/?p=3013#comment-2090 yay chat room. Nasa and all other government space agencies should be research and exploration based , NASA should go for the next big thing, build a big spaceship that is designed to fly around the orbit, ion drives ahoy yay chat room.

Nasa and all other government space agencies should be research and exploration based , NASA should go for the next big thing, build a big spaceship that is designed to fly around the orbit, ion drives ahoy

]]> By: ao6ao6 http://www.spacevidcast.com/2010/02/06/nasa-fy2011-and-spaceup-with-chris-radcliff-3-05/#comment-2089 ao6ao6 Sun, 07 Feb 2010 15:42:41 +0000 http://www.spacevidcast.com/?p=3013#comment-2089 so thay have the abletiy to get paylode and people to the moon? and if thay could ween we land would the land be mine or thers? so thay have the abletiy to get paylode and people to the moon?
and if thay could ween we land would the land be mine or thers?

]]> By: nilbud http://www.spacevidcast.com/2010/02/06/nasa-fy2011-and-spaceup-with-chris-radcliff-3-05/#comment-2086 nilbud Sun, 07 Feb 2010 11:31:02 +0000 http://www.spacevidcast.com/?p=3013#comment-2086 You mean it couldn't survive Bush and his criminal buddies. You're the kind of fool who gives out about water damage when the firemen save your house from burning down. You mean it couldn’t survive Bush and his criminal buddies. You’re the kind of fool who gives out about water damage when the firemen save your house from burning down.

]]> By: nilbud http://www.spacevidcast.com/2010/02/06/nasa-fy2011-and-spaceup-with-chris-radcliff-3-05/#comment-2087 nilbud Sun, 07 Feb 2010 11:29:38 +0000 http://www.spacevidcast.com/?p=3013#comment-2087 China, ESA, JAXA, maybe the Russians and Indians. China, ESA, JAXA, maybe the Russians and Indians.

]]> By: nilbud http://www.spacevidcast.com/2010/02/06/nasa-fy2011-and-spaceup-with-chris-radcliff-3-05/#comment-2088 nilbud Sun, 07 Feb 2010 11:26:59 +0000 http://www.spacevidcast.com/?p=3013#comment-2088 Yeah right, get back to the fifties you paranoid wierdo. Yeah right, get back to the fifties you paranoid wierdo.

]]> By: asa0207 http://www.spacevidcast.com/2010/02/06/nasa-fy2011-and-spaceup-with-chris-radcliff-3-05/#comment-2085 asa0207 Sun, 07 Feb 2010 09:48:03 +0000 http://www.spacevidcast.com/?p=3013#comment-2085 We Need A NASA Driven Manned Space Program. Our NATIONAL SECURITY Is At Stake. The Nation That Pushes Forward With Manned Space, WILL Be The Leader In Technology In All Areas. Yes, Let's Allow Private Industry To Compete But Our Manned Space Program Is Our LIFE INSURANCE POLICY To Our National Defense!!! We Need A NASA Driven Manned Space Program. Our NATIONAL SECURITY Is At Stake. The Nation That Pushes Forward With Manned Space, WILL Be The Leader In Technology In All Areas. Yes, Let’s Allow Private Industry To Compete But Our Manned Space Program Is Our LIFE INSURANCE POLICY To Our National Defense!!!

]]> By: NASA FY2011 and SpaceUp with Chris Radcliff – 3.05 | Spacevidcast … | Drakz Free Online Service http://www.spacevidcast.com/2010/02/06/nasa-fy2011-and-spaceup-with-chris-radcliff-3-05/#comment-2084 NASA FY2011 and SpaceUp with Chris Radcliff – 3.05 | Spacevidcast … | Drakz Free Online Service Sat, 06 Feb 2010 22:32:44 +0000 http://www.spacevidcast.com/?p=3013#comment-2084 [...] the article here: NASA FY2011 and SpaceUp with Chris Radcliff – 3.05 | Spacevidcast … Share and [...] [...] the article here: NASA FY2011 and SpaceUp with Chris Radcliff – 3.05 | Spacevidcast … Share and [...]

]]> By: numi1337 http://www.spacevidcast.com/2010/02/06/nasa-fy2011-and-spaceup-with-chris-radcliff-3-05/#comment-2083 numi1337 Sat, 06 Feb 2010 09:42:27 +0000 http://www.spacevidcast.com/?p=3013#comment-2083 @chaos6575 1) Better than no abortion system like at the shuttles and I don't think it was that useless. 2) I don't think that those modifications would have been cheaper than developing a 5 segment SRB and you would have needed Orion etc for both designs. The operation costs of the Ares 1 would have also been lower because you can recover the SRB. 3) It is expensive for Moon or Mars missions, thats right. But if you want to go to the ISS a heavy lifter would have way to high operation costs. @chaos6575
1) Better than no abortion system like at the shuttles and I don’t think it was that useless.
2) I don’t think that those modifications would have been cheaper than developing a 5 segment SRB and you would have needed Orion etc for both designs. The operation costs of the Ares 1 would have also been lower because you can recover the SRB.
3) It is expensive for Moon or Mars missions, thats right. But if you want to go to the ISS a heavy lifter would have way to high operation costs.

]]> By: chaos6575 http://www.spacevidcast.com/2010/02/06/nasa-fy2011-and-spaceup-with-chris-radcliff-3-05/#comment-2082 chaos6575 Sat, 06 Feb 2010 08:21:08 +0000 http://www.spacevidcast.com/?p=3013#comment-2082 The Ares I was always a bad idea. 1) You can't shut off solid boosters. If the crew had to abort , the capsule could have flown through the engine exhaust and doomed the crew. 2) The Delta IV and Altas V were in the same category as the Ares I. With some modification, they could have done the same thing. 3) Having two launch vehicles owned by NASA is expensive. The Ares I was always a bad idea.

1) You can’t shut off solid boosters. If the crew had to abort , the capsule could have flown through the engine exhaust and doomed the crew.
2) The Delta IV and Altas V were in the same category as the Ares I. With some modification, they could have done the same thing.
3) Having two launch vehicles owned by NASA is expensive.

]]> By: numi1337 http://www.spacevidcast.com/2010/02/06/nasa-fy2011-and-spaceup-with-chris-radcliff-3-05/#comment-2081 numi1337 Sat, 06 Feb 2010 05:57:35 +0000 http://www.spacevidcast.com/?p=3013#comment-2081 Why does everyone think that Ares 1 was a bad idea? Especially with the ISS in the sky until 2020 it would have been very good to have a launcher that has low operation costs and is human-rated for the crew-rotatio-missions. Or does NASA want to depend on the Russians for 10 more years? btw: Chris answered the orbiter question absolutely right ;) Why does everyone think that Ares 1 was a bad idea? Especially with the ISS in the sky until 2020 it would have been very good to have a launcher that has low operation costs and is human-rated for the crew-rotatio-missions. Or does NASA want to depend on the Russians for 10 more years?
btw: Chris answered the orbiter question absolutely right ;)

]]>