The old MAKS Russian Space Plane might be new again – 2010.04.28
This video was created by Benjamin Higginbotham on April 28, 2010
We’re spreading rumors about a old yet new Russian Space Plane on your Spacevidcast for April 28th, 2010.
It seems that unmanned space planes are all the rage these days. The Air Force recently launched their X-37B and last Friday Russia hinted that they may revive one of their long dead space plane programs. The Russian Multipurpose Aerospace System or MAKS is an innovative space plane that had its development frozen in 1991. In response to the US Air Force’s recent launch of the X-37B, the Russian aerospace designer Vladimir Skorodelov has said that this could spur Russia to restart their own defunct Space Plane program.
The Russian Shuttle is much like the X-37B, about the same size, same style, it is unmanned and can’t get to orbit on its own. Back when it was designed in the 80′s the Russian shuttle would launch aboard an An-225 airplane carrier, much like Virgin Galactic’s WhiteKnight carrier. Unlike Virgin Galactic the MAKS vehicle will sit atop the airplane, not below it.
The interesting thing about MAKS is that there is both an unmanned and manned configuration of the vehicle. Actually, there are three versions of MAKS on the table: MAKS-OS which is the manned orbital plane. MAKS-T which is designed to inject heavy payloads in to orbit. And finally MAKS-M which is a completely reusable unmanned space plane.
This isn’t the first space shuttle that Russia has designed and then cancelled. Back in 1988 the Soviet Union launched the unmanned Buran space shuttle. Buran was about the same size and shape as NASA’s current fleet of orbiters, but unlike NASA’s orbiters was able to fly completely unmanned. Due to financial difficulties the program never got any additional traction and only the one unmanned flight was made in November of 1988 and in 1992 the program was cancelled.
The development of the MAKS aerospace system started when Buran was still in the creation phase. The major goal of the MAKS project was to reduce the cost of space transportation operations and to increase the efficiency of the launch system itself. The current cost of sending 2.2 pounds of material to space aboard the US Space Shuttle is around $20,000 dollars. That means that 1 gallon of water would cost nearly $100,000 dollars to fly to the International Space station. It was and still is hoped that MAKS will be able to deliver the same weight for an estimated $1,000 to $1,200 dollars. Now, that same gallon of water would cost around $5,500 to bring to the ISS.
Of course it could be that nothing ever comes of this. Vladimir is the chief designer of NOP Molniya which was the company founded for the creation of the Buran shuttle and today works on reusable launch systems. This could just be wishful thinking on his part. Or it really could spur re-investment in to MAKS system for a next generation shuttle. While there are a few reports out there indicating that MAKS has been revived and is being pushed for launch as soon as possible, we have been unable to confirm said rumor and can only speculate at this time. Nevertheless, it sure would be cool if it was!
And don’t forget to join us this Friday at 0200 UTC for Spacevidcast Live. This week we will have on guest Bill Suitor who is the author of Rocketbet Pilot’s Manual. This is your chance to ask someone who has actually flown a rocketbelt your own questions. For those of you in the US the show will be this Thursday at 7:00pm PDT or 10:00pm EDT. Remember to pick up your copy of the Rocketbelt Pilot’s Manual from Apogeebooks.com before the show and we’ll see you there!


this shit would be cool if it was
DDDD couldnt sound more fake
DD
why did you say it like that :p
If they really want MAKS off the ground perhaps Russia and the United States should team up on it. With Ares scrapped NASA is going to need something to do, and Russia and the United States can’t seem to get much done unless they work together.
Now that Russia has some money,I would bet this is the way they will go
@Chrisjr2007 I was thinking the same thing. We have no data to back this story up outside of rumor, but it certainly feels like something Russia would not only be able to do but want to do as well.
Great video guys!
These ‘new/old’ machines being revived gives make me giggle. Its really awesome how the private secret is booming and the governments are ressurecting old technology at the same time. I think we are in for a ride in the next decade if all goes to plan.
There is nothing better then a little rivalry between major player US/RUS. Now that more countries are making commitments to reach space, its going to make things a lot more interesting.
Damn I love space travel. Road trip time?
It’s a real shame what happened to the soviet space program after the wall came down.
This is very slick. I think of the opening of Kubrick’s 2001, spaceplanes being used extensively to bring people to orbit. I think that it’s very cool that this program has three variants, for cargo, people, and a mix. A very elegant approach to varied problems in Earth-to-space operations. Then again, anyone who didn’t figure the Russians to be unorthodox innovators, when it comes to “use what you’ve got” thinking, needs to read about MIR.
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Spacevidcast, JazzGuru. JazzGuru said: Spacevidcast: The old MAKS Russian Space Plane might be new again – 2010.04.28 http://bit.ly/bK8lPR #tech #science #news [...]
excellent
the russian plane is nothing compared to ours….
Cmon Buran II!
i prefer these shorter versions of your videos…….good work!
@PoliticalStu Glad you like them. We have two variations of the show, the dailies which are around 5 minutes long and the weekly which is 30 to 60 minutes long. The weekly is designed to be a live format with interviews whereas the dailies are simply news and whatnot. Still tweaking, but I like how this is working out as well. Comments always welcome!
Pen PM
@RadicalAwesomeness I hear ya! The Russians were way ahead of the game when it came to the space race.
@spacevidcast Any words on China cooking up a space plane? I wouldn’t be surprised if they have something in the works.
@th3w01fv2 I don’t think that they were ahead of the Americans but still, they were light years ahead other space agencies.
OK – so if this is about a RUSSIAN project, why was there a B/W pic in there with USAF and stars and stripes markings?
CONTINUITY CHECK!!!
Oops
@RadicalAwesomeness I somehow think they were. 1st satellite, 1st man into space, 1st woman into space, 1st spacewalk, 1st probes to Venus, 1st space station and many more. America only won the race to the moon.
I have a video of an earlier (1977) prototype being dropped from a bomber during landing tests.
they copy everything… like Chinese
It is tragic that the Buran was destroyed and people died. I did not know this.
Она трагична, что Бурана был разрушен, и человек погибли. Я не знаю это.
“Shuttle” and “Buran” rather different technically. It not copies each other. The “Buran” has grown from the Soviet program “Spiral”. It was the original project.
I do hope this is not a rumor!
something tells me it only existed on board…
we can built more good lighting speed space shuttles which can travel twice as much speed as light by powerin them by puttin nucler power reacter & outter coolin system to contol to over heat from such speed..it wud be more fast n fuel efficent
Google for Spiral. It was designed and tested around 1965, a military spaceplane, much like the X-37B is. MAKS is the improved Spiral. Buran program was dictated by the government which wanted a copy of the Shuttle, despite that Spiral/MAKS was better. Just like the Shuttle has no real practical use and costs billions to fly, the Buran was pretty much useless as well and was canceled.